No AccessAgricultureNov 2021
This paper uses a randomized controlled experiment in which farmers trained on a new rice cultivation method teach two other farmers. The results show that the intervention increases yields and farm profits among treated farmers. Teacher-trainees are effective at spreading knowledge and inducing adoption relative to just training. Incentivizing teacher-trainees improves knowledge transmission but not adoption. Matching teacher-trainees with farmers who list them as role models does not improve knowledge transmission and may hurt adoption. Using mediation analysis, the study finds that the knowledge of the teacher-trainee is correlated with that of their students, consistent with knowledge transmission. The paper also finds that systems of rice intensification (SRI) knowledge predicts adoption of some SRI practices, and that adoption by teacher-trainees predicts adoption by their students, suggesting that students follow the example of their teacher. With cost-benefit estimates of social returns in excess of 100 percent, explicitly mobilizing peer-to-peer (P2P) transmission of knowledge seems a cost-effective way of inducing the adoption of new profitable agricultural practices.
References
- . 2020. “Marching Frictions and Distorted Beliefs: Evidence from a Job Fail Experiment.” Department of Economics, Oxford University (mimeo). Google Scholar
- . 2009. “Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially.” American Economic Review 99 (1): 544–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2007. “Incentives for Managers and Inequality among Workers: Evidence from a Firm-Level Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (2): 729–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2010. “Social Incentives in the Workplace.” Review of Economic Studies 77 (2): 417–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2017. “Labor Markets and Poverty in Village Economies.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (2): 811–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2006. “Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique.” Economic Journal 116 (514): 869–902. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2013. “The Diffusion of Microfinance.” Science 341 (6144): 1236598-1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2020. “The Effects of Exposure Intensity on Technology Adoption and Gains: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh on the System of Rice Intensification.” Working Paper, Cornell University. Google Scholar
- . 2004. “Better Technology, Better Plots, or Better Farmers? Identifying Changes in Productivity and Risk among Malagasy Rice Farmers.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (4): 869–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . Forthcoming. “Can Network Theory-Based Targeting Increase Technology Adoption?” American Economic Review. Google Scholar
- . 2019. “Social Learning and Incentives for Experimentation and Communication.” Review of Economic Studies 86 (3): 976–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2019. “Motivating Knowledge Agents: Can Incentive Pay Overcome Social Distance?” Economic Journal 129 (617): 110–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2013. “Does Management Matter? Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (1): 1–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2009. “Neighbourhood Peer Effects in Secondary School Enrollment Decisions.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (4): 695–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2013. “Social Networks and the Decision to Insure.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7 (2): 81–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2017. “Teaching Personal Initiative Beats Traditional Training in Boosting Small Businesses in West Africa.” Science 357 (6357): 1287–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2014. “Measuring the Effects of Interventions in BRAC, and How This Has Driven ‘Development’.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6 (4): 407–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2010. “Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana.” American Economic Review 100 (1): 35–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2012. “Incentives Work: Getting Teachers to Come to School.” American Economic Review 102 (4): 1241–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2011. “Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya.” American Economic Review 101 (6): 2350–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2020. “Can Referral Improve Targeting? Evidence from an Agricultural Training Experiment.” Journal of Development Economics 144: 102436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2018. “Networks and Manufacturing Firms in Africa: Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” World Bank Economic Review 32 (3): 656–75. AbstractGoogle Scholar
- . 1995. “Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture.” Journal of Political Economy, 103 (6): 1176–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2013. “Information Transmission in Irrigation Technology Adoption and Diffusion: Social Learning, Extension Services, and Spatial Effects.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (1): 328–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2006. “Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments.” Econometrica 74 (5): 1365–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2000. “Pay Enough or Don’t Pay at All.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3): 791–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2018. “Productivity in Piece-Rate Labor Markets: Evidence from Rural Malawi.” Journal of Development Economics 131: 42–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- 2018. “Why Do Firms Hire Using Referrals? Evidence from Bangladeshi Garment Factories.” Journal of Political Economy, 126 (4): 1691–746. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 1952. “A Generalization of Sampling without Replacement from a Finite Universe.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 47 (260): 663–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2019. “Agricultural Microcredit for Tenant Farmers: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Bangladesh.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 101 (3): 692–709. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2009. “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (1): 5–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2018. “Can Public Recognition Backfire? Field Experimental Evidence on the Retention and Performance of Volunteers with Heterogeneous Social-Image Concerns.” Working Paper, Monash University. Google Scholar
- . 2004. “Validation of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) Practice through Spacing, Seedling Age and Water Management.” Bangladesh Agronomy Journal 10 (1&2): 13–21. Google Scholar
- . 2005. “Validation of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Bangladesh.” Field Crops Research 93 (2&3): 281–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- 2002. “Evaluating the Effect of Teachers? Group Performance Incentives on Pupil Achievement.” Journal of Political Economy 110 (6): 1286–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2010. “The Effect of Financial Rewards on Students. Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Journal of the European Economic Association 8 (6): 1243–65. Google Scholar
- . 2015. “Learning about New Technologies through Social Networks: Experimental Evidence on Non-Traditional Stoves in Rural Bangladesh.” Marketing Science 34 (4): 480–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2006. “The Complex Dynamics of Smallholder Technology Adoption: The Case of SRI in Madagascar.” Agricultural Economics 35 (3): 373–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2011. “Teacher Performance Pay: Experimental Evidence from India.” Journal of Political Economy 19 (1): 39–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2012. “Determinants of Technology Adoption: Peer Effects in Menstrual Cup Take-Up.” Journal of the European Economic Association 10 (6): 1263–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2007. “Productivity Impacts of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI): A Case Study in West Bengal, India.” Agricultural Water Management 87 (1): 55–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2002. “A Review of Agricultural Research Issues Raised by the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: Opportunities for Improving Farming Systems for Resource-Poor Farmers.” Agricultural Systems 71 (3): 249–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2014. “The System of Rice Intensification and Its Impacts on Household Income and Child Schooling: Evidence from Rural Indonesia.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (1): 269–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- . 2018. “NGOs and the Effectiveness of Interventions.” UNU WIDER Working Paper 2018/59. Google Scholar
More Stories
The Future Unveiled: Top Industry Trends Reshaping Business in 2024
Navigating the Next Wave: Emerging Industry Trends Reshaping the Future
Unveiling Tomorrow’s Shifts: Industry Trends Reshaping the Business Landscape